Biodiversity arks in the Anthropocene
Regional Sustainability, ISSN: 2666-660X, Vol: 2, Issue: 2, Page: 109-115
2021
- 26Citations
- 11Usage
- 54Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations26
- Citation Indexes26
- 26
- Usage11
- Downloads8
- Abstract Views3
- Captures54
- Readers54
- 54
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent News
Will Indigenous sovereignty be on the agenda at COP15?
Msit No’kmaq, Wahkohtawin, Nindinawemaganidog — all loosely translate into the phrase “all my relations,” which is defined by a kinship between beings in the natural
Article Description
The Anthropocene proposal suggested that the Earth may have entered a new geological epoch, in which human activity and climate change are influencing the environment at global scale. Arrival of the Anthropocene is bringing an unprecedented challenge to the biodiversity that is essential to humans, and enhancing many benefits of nature to human being. However, biodiversity loss is aggravating in the rhythm of inevitable change in the Anthropocene, and the adaptation of biodiversity to the anthropogenic disturbance seems unable to keep pace with the human activity and climate change. Therefore, re-examination of the assumptions and practices upon the current conservation endeavor are needed. We suggested that biodiversity conservation should be paid more attention to the response from biodiversity to the human activity and climate change in the Anthropocene. Thus, the concept of biodiversity arks in the Anthropocene is proposed, that is, biodiversity arks in the Anthropocene are the areas where vulnerable biodiversity is sheltered to alleviate human activity and buffered from climate change under the anthropogenic disturbance. The concept should be implemented for biodiversity conservation to fill gaps between our knowledge and build on successful conservation and sustainability in the Anthropocene. It will be certainly important to conservation policy instruction and management under climate change, especially the implementation of climate buffering zones preserving biodiversity in the face of warming climate.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666660X21000165; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsus.2021.03.001; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85108091969&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2666660X21000165; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S2666660X21000165?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S2666660X21000165?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dul.usage.elsevier.com/doi/; https://egijournals.researchcommons.org/regional-sustainability/vol2/iss2/1; https://egijournals.researchcommons.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1018&context=regional-sustainability; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsus.2021.03.001
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know