The evaluation of reanalysis and analysis products of solar radiation for Sindh province, Pakistan
Renewable Energy, ISSN: 0960-1481, Vol: 145, Page: 347-362
2020
- 28Citations
- 51Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The quality of the surface solar irradiance (SSI) data from three numerical meteorological reanalysis products (NCEP-NCAR, NCEP-DOE and JRA-55) and two analysis products (NCEP-FNL and NCEP-GFS) are analysed by comparing with in-situ high-quality SSI measurement. The validation of estimates of SSI against measured data is done based on mean bias error (MBE), root mean squared error (RMSE), relative MBE, relative RMSE and coefficient of determination ( R 2 ). The rMBE, rRMSE and R 2 for five estimated SSI datasets for both stations range from −10.5–28.0%, 19.2–41.4% and 0.870 to 0.969 respectively. The measured clearness index shows that the cloud fraction is not accurately incorporated while estimating SSI from datasets, which is the main reason for errors, especially higher errors in the summer season because of Monsoon. The NCEP-FNL and NCEP-GFS predict cloudy conditions where the actual conditions are clear-sky, whereas the NCEP-NCAR predicts clear-sky conditions where the actual conditions are cloudy. The overestimation of clear-sky conditions leads to the overestimation of the SSI and the clearness index and vice versa. The overall results show that the estimates from NCEP-NCAR are the worst among all the datasets whereas NCEP-FNL and NCEP-DOE predict well for Karachi and Hyderabad respectively.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148119305919; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.04.107; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85067599940&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0960148119305919; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0960148119305919?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0960148119305919?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dul.usage.elsevier.com/doi/; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.04.107
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know