Two-stage energy scheduling optimization model for complex industrial process and its industrial verification
Renewable Energy, ISSN: 0960-1481, Vol: 193, Page: 879-894
2022
- 4Citations
- 16Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
As complex industries move towards small batches and customization, the uncertainty of the operation time of intermittent electrical devices increases, leading to an increasing fluctuation range of the complex industrial electrical load. To ensure the regular production process, the fossil power plant increases the installed capacity of generators, which can sharply raise carbon emissions. Renewable energy generation has been introduced to reduce carbon emissions and achieve power generation sustainability. However, the instability of renewable energy generation increases the fluctuation range of transmission voltage, leading to highly unsafe electricity transmission. Energy Storage Systems (ESSs) solves the instability problem of renewable energy generation. Thus, this study proposes a two-stage energy scheduling optimization model for complex industrial processes. The first stage proposes a scheduling optimization model for intermittent electrical devices with high electricity consumption. The second stage proposes a scheduling optimization model for the ESS to optimize the transmission capacity proportion of photovoltaic (PV) power plants, ESS, and fossil power plants. The results show that the proposed two-stage scheduling optimization model for the complex industrial process can reduce electricity cost by 7.1%–9.1%, and carbon emissions by 384 tons of standard coal in a year.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148122007054; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.05.064; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85130270821&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0960148122007054; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.05.064
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know