Geothermal trigeneration systems with Organic Rankine Cycles: Evaluation of different plant configurations considering part load behaviour
Renewable Energy, ISSN: 0960-1481, Vol: 207, Page: 218-233
2023
- 8Citations
- 13Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Due to the increasing importance of cooling applications, geothermal trigeneration systems might be of high interest in the future. This work aims at evaluating different plant layouts against the background of more advanced plant configurations and part load behaviour. Five different plant configurations are analysed for geothermal heat source temperatures between 110 and 150 °C. The highest net power output is achieved by an advanced serial-parallel configuration (ASPC), but in case of high heating and cooling demand, a standard serial-parallel configuration is more favourable. For the considered base demand scenario of 130 °C, the ASPC results in an annual net power generation of 20.94 GWh, which is 6.9% higher than the second favourable configuration. The application of a recuperator within the ORC system has a significant impact on the serial concepts, but only marginally increases the power output of the parallel layouts. Comparing two exergetic efficiencies highlights that the assumed definition can result in a different ranking of the plant layouts. Considering the exergy that is transferred from the brine to the trigeneration system reveals the highest exergetic efficiency for a serial configuration, while the focus on the available exergy flow reveals the highest efficiency for the ASPC layout. Considering a brine temperature of 130 °C results in a maximal achievable second law efficiency of 34.1% if evaluating the available exergy flow. The evaluation of the pay-back period reveals that the ASPC results in the shortest pay-back period of 13.8 years.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148123001866; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.02.042; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85149903538&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0960148123001866; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.02.042
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know