Validating EURO-CORDEX climate simulations for modelling European wind power generation
Renewable Energy, ISSN: 0960-1481, Vol: 217, Page: 118989
2023
- 9Citations
- 20Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
As the energy system becomes increasingly dependent on intermittent meteorological sources, there is a need to understand better the possible consequences of a changing climate on weather variability and how it will affect wind power generation in the future. Most previous validation studies of regional climate datasets focus on the distributional properties or, in fewer cases, the variability at lower frequencies, such as interannual and seasonal. However, accurate wind variability at a high-enough resolution (e.g., hourly) is crucial for many aspects of power and energy system analyses. Using European country-level wind generation data and metrics relevant to power and energy system applications, we validate the wind speed output from seven regional climate models from the EURO-CORDEX project. We show that the EURO-CORDEX models adjusted with the Global Wind Atlas (GWA2) can simulate temporal dependencies and generation distributions with accuracy similar to or better than the ERA5 reanalysis. The spatial correlations, however, are overestimated compared to observations by most analysed models. Assuming the GWA2 scaling is also valid for the future, the projections under the RCP8.5 scenario show a slight negative trend (2026–2065) in capacity factors for most analysed European countries.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148123008959; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.118989; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85168616917&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0960148123008959; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.118989
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know