Capacity planning of wind-photovoltaic-electrolysis-battery system coupling renewable fuel synthesis
Renewable Energy, ISSN: 0960-1481, Vol: 237, Page: 121609
2024
- 3Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures3
- Readers3
Article Description
The wind-photovoltaic-electrolysis-battery (WPEB) system coupling fuel synthesis by supplying hydrogen and electricity simultaneously can reduce the carbon emission intensity of renewable fuels. However the capacity planning method is rarely reported, this work takes WPEB system coupling renewable methanol synthesis as an example. The business mode and the effect of load profile shape on the capacity configuration are first studied. Then, a two-stage capacity planning method is proposed to improve system performance: At the 1st stage, the capacity configuration is performed using 5 typical load profiles, and the case with minimum net present cost (NPC) is regarded as a pseudo-optimal solution. In the 2nd stage, the wind & solar power profile of the pseudo-optimal solution is standardized and the shape is used to build a variable renewable energy (VRE) flowing load profile as model input, the capacity planning result in the 2nd stage is regarded as the optimal case. The main conclusions are summarized below: (1) The WPEB system has five revenues from selling electricity, methanol, oxygen, CO 2 trading in China certified emission reduction (CCER) market and carbon emission allowance (CEA) market. (2) Deep valley load profile obtains the lowest NPC of 2.7656 billion¥ and greatest internal rate of return (IRR) of 6.8843 % among 5 typical profiles. (3) The two-stage planning method can further decline the NPC to 2.2018 billion¥ and boost IRR to 10.5583 % by employing demand-side flexibility. (4) The sensitivity factors contributing to IRR orders from high to low are methanol price > O 2 price > CO 2 price of CCER > unmet H 2 penalty > electricity price.
Bibliographic Details
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know