Numerical study on efficiency and applicability of prefabricated modular ground heat exchangers in shallow depth
Renewable Energy, ISSN: 0960-1481, Vol: 237, Page: 121857
2024
- 3Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures3
- Readers3
Article Description
This study developed and validated a CFD model to evaluate the performance of modular ground heat exchangers (GHEs) compared to vertical closed-loop GHEs. The reliability of the model was confirmed through comparison with field experiment data, with RMSE values of 0.35 °C and 0.27 °C for inlet and outlet temperatures, respectively. Additionally, the performance of modular GHEs installed at shallow depths was evaluated under various external environmental conditions, revealing a temperature difference of approximately 7 °C between the intermediate and cooling periods. A comparison of the performance of modular and vertical GHEs of the same heat exchanger length showed that, when a constant heat load of 2 kW was maintained for 100 h, the temperature in the vertical GHE increased to 32.8 °C, while the modular GHE reached 38.5 °C. Despite the high thermal conductivity resulting from ground heat storage effects, the modular GHE exhibited a greater temperature increase due to its shallow installation depth compared to the vertical GHE. On the other hand, as the thermal conductivity of the ground decreased, the temperature difference between the two systems also decreased. These results suggest that modular GHEs can be a cost-effective and efficient solution, particularly in regions with low ground thermal conductivity.
Bibliographic Details
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know