Thinking about breathing: Effects on respiratory sinus arrhythmia
Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology, ISSN: 1569-9048, Vol: 223, Page: 28-36
2016
- 29Citations
- 79Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations29
- Citation Indexes29
- 29
- CrossRef22
- Captures79
- Readers79
- 79
Article Description
Respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA), the increase and decrease in instantaneous heart rate (HR) with inspiration and expiration, is commonly evaluated as function of breathing frequency f. However, to the extent that RSA plays a role in the efficiency of gas exchange, it may be expected to correlate better with HR/ f (‘breathing specific heart rate’) than with f, because the former is a better reflection of the cardio-respiratory coupling. We measured RSA breath-by-breath in 209 young men and women during spontaneous breathing and during volitional breathing under auditory cues at vastly different f. In either case, and for both genders, RSA correlated better with HR/ f than with f. As HR/ f increased so did RSA, in a linear manner. When compared on the basis of HR/ f, RSA did not differ significantly between spontaneous and volitional breathing. It is proposed that RSA is a central mechanism that ameliorates the matching between the quasi-continuous pulmonary blood flow and the intermittent airflow, irrespective of the type of ventilatory drive (cortical or autonomic).
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569904815300963; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2015.12.004; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84952673652&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26724603; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1569904815300963; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2015.12.004
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know