A health assessment method with attribute importance modeling for complex systems using belief rule base
Reliability Engineering & System Safety, ISSN: 0951-8320, Vol: 251, Page: 110387
2024
- 3Citations
- 4Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In the health assessment for complex systems, system attributes refer to the indicators or components having an impact on the health state of the system. When assessing the health state of complex systems, the relative importance of system attributes should be accurately modeled, otherwise incorrect results may occur. Especially for some complex systems with small samples, data-driven methods are prone to overfitting. In this article, a new method using belief rule base (BRB) is proposed to model the relative importance of system attributes while assessing the health state. As an interpretable modeling tool, BRB constructs nonlinear mapping relationships between system attributes and health state. A data-knowledge hybrid-driven ensemble feature selection (DKH-EFS) method is developed to calculate the relative importance of the system attributes, namely attribute importance (AM). A random sensitivity analysis (RSA) method of the model output to the input of BRB is proposed to calculate the feature importance (FI) of BRB. A new parameter optimization model considering the consistency between the AM and FI is introduced to improve the modeling ability of BRB for the AM. A case study on the health assessment of the fiber optic gyroscope (FOG) validates the proposed method.
Bibliographic Details
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know