Opciones terapéuticas para el tratamiento antifúngico en el paciente crítico
Revista Iberoamericana de Micología, ISSN: 1130-1406, Vol: 29, Issue: 2, Page: 108-113
2012
- 7Citations
- 17Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations7
- Citation Indexes7
- CrossRef4
- Captures17
- Readers17
- 12
Article Description
Debido a sus tasas altas de morbimortalidad y a los elevados costes sanitarios asociados, las infecciones fúngicas invasivas en el paciente crítico son un adecuado objetivo para el desarrollo de estrategias terapéuticas, tanto profilácticas, como empíricas o anticipadas. Para intentar disminuir su elevada mortalidad, se han desarrollado nuevas técnicas de laboratorio que ayudan a la instauración temprana del tratamiento. En los últimos años se ha evaluado el papel de los nuevos antifúngicos en este contexto, aunque son escasos los estudios que incluyen a pacientes críticos. La mayoría de las guías y las recomendaciones publicadas respaldan la estrategia de desescalada terapéutica, especialmente en el paciente con inestabilidad hemodinámica, aconsejando el uso de equinocandinas como primera opción en la candidiasis invasiva y de voriconazol para el tratamiento de la aspergilosis invasiva.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130140612000459; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.riam.2012.03.009; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84859042197&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22463788; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1130140612000459; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.riam.2012.03.009
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know