Azolla processing technologies for an alternative feed raw material
Results in Engineering, ISSN: 2590-1230, Vol: 19, Page: 101313
2023
- 35Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures35
- Readers35
- 35
Review Description
The increasing demand for animal feed and limited availability of traditional feed raw materials have led to a growing interest in the use of alternative sources. Previous investigations have established that the Azolla plant can accelerate the growth of livestock by 10–20%. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the use of Azolla as alternative feed raw material and assess the processing technology for its potential as a sustainable solution for the feed industry. The processing technology involved a combination of physical, chemical, drying, and grinding techniques. The results showed that the processing technology significantly improved the nutritional value of the Azolla as alternative feed raw material. The physical quality of the feed was also improved, leading to better handling and storage properties. The processing technology had different effects on various feed raw materials, as Azolla required drying at a controlled temperature of 40–60 °C to maintain the protein content. This analysis demonstrated the potential of Azolla as an alternative feed raw material for a sustainable solution in the feed industry. The processing technology significantly improved the nutritional value of the feed, leading to better animal performance and reduced environmental impact. However, the selection of processing technology should be carefully considered based on the specific characteristics of the feed raw material, which digital manufacturing technologies play a significant role for this purpose.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590123023004401; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101313; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85165538566&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2590123023004401; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101313
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know