Workplace trust as a mechanism of employee (dis)advantage: The case of employee socioeconomic status
Research in Organizational Behavior, ISSN: 0191-3085, Vol: 37, Page: 83-101
2017
- 12Citations
- 1,148Usage
- 74Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations12
- Citation Indexes12
- 12
- CrossRef8
- Usage1,148
- Downloads1,032
- 1,032
- Abstract Views116
- Captures74
- Readers74
- 74
Review Description
Early work on trust in social science highlighted how the lack of trust between individuals can cause social division, contribute to social stratification, and reduce economic opportunities for people from all social groups. We integrate this work with organizational research on antecedents of trust to generate predictions explaining when and why low employee socioeconomic status (SES) can be a barrier to trust. We discuss how this process can impair the success of both organizations as well as their lower-SES employees. We present a model, and data, suggesting that lower-SES employees will be both more distrusted as well as more distrustful relative to their higher-SES colleagues. This, in turn, locks them out of potentially advantageous social and economic exchanges. Our theory adds precision in detecting when and why lower-SES employees face barriers to success in organizations, as well as provides a blueprint for studying the impact of trust on socially disadvantaged groups in organizations.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191308517300096; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2017.10.006; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85034456691&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0191308517300096; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5357; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6356&context=lkcsb_research; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2017.10.006
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know