Forced expiratory decay in asthmatic preschool children – Is it adult type?
Respiratory Medicine, ISSN: 0954-6111, Vol: 107, Issue: 7, Page: 975-980
2013
- 5Citations
- 15Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations5
- Citation Indexes5
- CrossRef3
- Captures15
- Readers15
- 15
Article Description
The forced expiratory decay in healthy preschool children portrays a convex shape that differs from the linear decay in the older healthy population. The “adult-type” expiratory decay during airway obstruction is concave. The study objective was to determine if the expiratory decay in young asthmatic children is “adult-type”. Among 245 children (age 3–7 yrs), 178 had asthma (asthmatics) and 67 were non-asthmatic (controls). The expiratory flow decay was inspected by FEF25-75/FVC ratio (=1.0 when linear). Values were compared to those of our formerly studied ( n = 108) healthy children. A meaningful obstruction in FEF25-75/FVC ratio was defined as 2-zScores from healthy. A meaningful response to bronchodilators was related to non-asthmatics. In healthy subjects FEF25-75/FVC ratio declined with age from 1.73 ± 0.17 to 1.28 ± 0.11. Non-asthmatics portrayed ratio values similar to those of healthy subjects. In asthmatics, 118/178 displayed a convex to linear expiratory decay (FEF25-75/FVC = 1.33 ± 0.22). Sixty/178 asthmatics portrayed concavity (FEF25-75/FVC-0.79 ± 0.16) that appeared when FEF50 was 43.4 ± 12%healthy. Concavity appearance was also age-dependent (30.4% of 3–4 y old and 59.1% of 6–7 y). Vital-Capacity decreased in either decays, forming a visually petit curve. Most asthmatic children respond to bronchodilators by a meaningful elevation in FEF25-75/FVC values and by a visual change in the shape of the curve. Other common spirometry indices also increased meaningfully. Most asthmatic preschool children portray convex to linear expiratory decay with diminished vital-capacity, resulting in a visually smaller than healthy curve, with seemingly normal expiratory decay. These curves may be misinterpreted as “normal” or as “no-cooperation” and may lead to misinterpretation. In response to bronchodilators, FEF25-75/FVC value increases in asthmatics and the curve changes from concave to linear or from linear to convex contour.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954611113001224; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2013.03.012; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84878925725&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23664671; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0954611113001224
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know