Fermentative biohydrogen production and its byproducts: A mini review of current technology developments
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, ISSN: 1364-0321, Vol: 82, Page: 4215-4220
2018
- 71Citations
- 208Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Review Description
This work highlighted the latest studies on fermentative biohydrogen production and its byproducts from (1) the APEC-BPT/ABBS-2015 Conference (held on September 2015 in Taiwan) with partly from (2) the ABBS 2016 Conference (held on October 2016 in South Korea) and (3) recent journal publications. Some novel technologies for enhancing biohydrogen production and integration systems for agricultural or industrial waste/wastewater treatment and bioenergy production were shared and discussed by ten keynote speakers. It has shown that the recent research trends are focusing on biohydrogen production enhancement, via a two-stage of photo-dark fermentation, a photosynthetic bacteria biofilm or an integration system of effectively using fermentation effluent. Real wastes/wastewaters such as palm-related biomasses were used as the feedstock for future application purpose. Moreover, some other recent journal reports indicate the importance of developing biohydrogen technology for generating sustainable biohythane, in enhancing energy recovery via two-stage anaerobic digestion and having the potential gradually to become a major hydrogen-generating technology for future development of green economy. In commercializing the biohydrogen technology, some key issues need to be solved are feedstock source exploration, improving bio-H 2 production, developing H 2 separation technology, utilization of bio-H 2 and recovery of fermentation bioproducts. The role of algae in bio-H 2 production technology was also discussed.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032117314867; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.11.001; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85033382322&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1364032117314867; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.11.001
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know