Palaeoecological significances of deep-sea benthic foraminifera from Cascadia Margin, North East Pacific Ocean
Regional Studies in Marine Science, ISSN: 2352-4855, Vol: 47, Page: 101949
2021
- 1Citations
- 17Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The strong relationship between benthic foraminifera’s habitat and morphological characteristics to their surrounding environment are dominant component in marine community. This study attempts to understand the significance of benthic foraminifera in ecological importance and paleoceanographic reconstructions at Cascadia Margin, NE Pacific Ocean during the Pleistocene. The quantitative analyses of deep sea benthic foraminifera, particularly Bulimina exilis, Cibicides kullenbergi, Elphidium batialis, Epistominella exigua and Uvigerina proboscidea generally show higher abundances in the studied interval. The Gas Hydrate Stability Zone in the Cascadia Margin at ∼ 1200 ka to 162 ka (GHSZ; ∼ 240–70 mbsf) is related to low temperature and high-pressure conditions which are responsible for lower abundances of benthic foraminifera across that interval. The Alaska Current, North Pacific Current and California Current, also known as Eastern Boundary Currents (EBC), play a major role in the transportation of suspended sediments and coastal upwelling throughout the coast across the ∼ 650 to 450 ka and ∼ 35 to 2 ka intervals. The relative abundance rate of benthic foraminiferal community decreases with increasing core depth, indicating the influence of less ventilated and nutrient-enriched North Pacific Intermediate Water (NPIW). The present study also signifies the disappearance of benthic faunas throughout the Early–Middle Pleistocene Transition (EMPT, 1250–700 ka, Clark et al., 2006) period due to increased cyclic seasonality and decreased food supply, with few species ( Bolivina alata, Bolivina spathulata, Cibicides wuellerstorfi, Epistominella exigua, Gavelinopsis lobatulus and Uvigerina peregrina) being exceptions.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352485521003418; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2021.101949; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85111684700&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2352485521003418; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2021.101949
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know