Microbiota composition of an autochthonous Krškopolje pig breed reared in two different organic production systems
Research in Veterinary Science, ISSN: 0034-5288, Vol: 182, Page: 105449
2025
- 3Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures3
- Readers3
Article Description
It has been shown that different production systems (conventional vs. pasture-raised pigs) and co-rearing of pigs with other livestock influence the gut microbiota composition in pigs. In this study, two independent trials were conducted to investigate the 16S fecal microbiota of the autochthonous Krškopolje pig. In each trial, three study groups were analyzed: ( i ) pasture-raised pigs cohabiting with small ruminants (group L1, farm 1), ( ii ) indoor-raised pigs without contact with other farm animals (group L2, farm 2) and fed the same commercial organic feed as the other two groups, and ( iii ) pasture-raised pigs cohabiting with cattle (group L3, farm 2). The pigs were sampled four times during the grower-finisher period, corresponding to the different seasons. A total of 18 and 22 pigs were included in trials 1 and 2, respectively. Alpha diversity was comparable between the study groups and the pigs of different age categories. The two predominant bacterial phyla in all three groups were Bacteroidota and Firmicutes. Significant differences in microbiota composition were found between pigs of different age categories in both trials (nonparametric MANOVA, p < 0.008). The microbiota composition of pigs from group L1 was significantly different from that of pigs from groups L2 and L3, whereas groups L2 and L3 tended to be more similar in both trials. The present results indicate that the trial and the farm of origin have a significant influence on the pig gut microbiota, and that their influence is more pronounced than that of the housing system.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034528824003163; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2024.105449; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85210127139&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39602846; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0034528824003163
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know