Evaluating working memory capacity and cognitive load in learning from goal based scenario centered 3D multimedia
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, ISSN: 1877-0428, Vol: 2, Issue: 2, Page: 4480-4486
2010
- 7Citations
- 51Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The purpose of this study is to investigate working memory capacity and cognitive load in learning from Goal Based Scenario centered 3D multimedia learning environment (GBSc3DM) designed based on Cognitive Load Theory (CLT). GBSc3DM was developed in two versions. In the designed of the first version (+CLT) cognitive load principles were applied. In the second version (-CLT), however, the principles were violated. 47 11th grade high school students were selected based on their working memory capacity (WMC). A series of parametric and non parametric statistical techniques were used to analyze the data. The findings are discussed in the following sections.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187704281000755X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.715; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77957702591&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S187704281000755X; https://dul.usage.elsevier.com/doi/; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S187704281000755X?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S187704281000755X?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.715
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know