Quality assessment of chicken using machine learning and electronic nose
Sensing and Bio-Sensing Research, ISSN: 2214-1804, Vol: 47, Page: 100739
2025
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures2
- Readers2
Article Description
Meat is highly perishable food and prone to microbial contamination under various storage conditions. Quality assessment at both retail and industrial levels often relies on organoleptic properties, gas chromatography, and total bacterial count, all of which require trained personnel and significant resources. As a result, there is a need for a more efficient and reliable system to determine chicken quality. This study investigates the use of an electronic nose system—a sensor array that detects odors and generates data, which is then analyzed by machine learning algorithms to predict chicken freshness. An electronic nose system was developed using six MQ gas sensors and one humidity temperature sensor. Data was collected from chicken samples over a period of 15 days. To evaluate the performance of the machine learning algorithms, different data splitting approaches were tested to understand their impact on model accuracy. Random Forest achieved 100 % accuracy with randomly split data and 69 % accuracy with non-randomly split data. Support Vector Machine, using the recursive feature elimination technique, attained 78.5 % accuracy without random splitting. The study also reviewed existing literature, highlighting that random data splitting is not suitable for electronic nose data. Overall, the findings suggest that the electronic nose system, combined with appropriate data handling and machine learning techniques, can effectively assess chicken freshness, potentially offering a valuable tool for the poultry industry.
Bibliographic Details
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know