Neuropsychological, clinical and cognitive insight predictors of outcome in a first episode psychosis study
Schizophrenia Research, ISSN: 0920-9964, Vol: 149, Issue: 1, Page: 70-76
2013
- 43Citations
- 162Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations43
- Citation Indexes43
- 43
- CrossRef19
- Captures162
- Readers162
- 158
Article Description
The outcome of first episode psychosis (FEP) is highly variable and difficult to predict. We studied prospectively the impact of poor insight and neuropsychological deficits on outcomes in a longitudinal cohort of 127 FEP patients. Participants were assessed on 5 domains of cognitive function and 2 domains of insight (clinical and cognitive). At 12 months, patients were assessed again for symptom severity and psychosocial function. Regression analyses revealed that cognitive insight (a measure of self-reflectiveness and self-certainty) was the best baseline predictor of overall psychopathology at 12 months whereas executive function performance at admission to the study indicated later severity of negative symptoms. Other neuropsychological and insight measures were poor predictors of psychosocial function at 1 year. The results suggest that specific neuropsychological and insight factors have separate predictive capacities indicating that they are distinct psychological processes in psychosis. Cognitive insight proved to be a useful prognostic indicator, and should be considered for future studies and as a potential focus for treatment.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920996413003058; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2013.06.005; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84881253916&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23815972; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0920996413003058; http://www.schres-journal.com/article/S0920-9964(13)00305-8/abstract
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know