Topping sweet orange trees as Diaphorina citri bait on the farm edge for huanglongbing management: Opportunities and limitations

Flush shoots of citrus have an important role in huanglongbing (HLB) epidemiology, as the insect vector of HLB, the Asian citrus psyllid (ACP), prefers them for feeding and reproduction. Additionally, ACP's acquisition and transmission of HLB bacteria mainly occurs in these flushes. As pruning stimulates sprouting, we hypothesized that periodically topping sweet orange trees on the orchard's edge (from 0 to 100 m) would attract ACPs from external areas to these flush shoots as bait, instead of ACPs dispersing throughout the orchard. Hence, it would direct HLB management on this edge width. For that, topped trees (TT) were compared to non-topped trees (NTT) located on the orchard's edge, with only NTT after edges (from 100 to 200 m). Vegetative growth, flushing frequency, ACP population, spray coverage, HLB incidence, fruit yield, and quality of Hamlin and Valencia Americana sweet orange trees were evaluated in commercial orchards over three growing seasons. Topping was performed frequently (every 30–45 d) on alternate rows to stimulate the year-round presence of shoot flushes within the orchard's edge. Insecticides were sprayed monthly to control ACP. Topping reduced tree height and canopy volume by 24 % and 20 % on average. Topped trees presented, on average, 3-fold more flush shoots than NTT over time. On Hamlin blocks, ACP numbers and cumulative HLB incidence were 70 % and 90 % higher, respectively, in TT compared to NTT. However, no consistent differences were observed for the Valencia Americana orchard. Moreover, ACP abundance and HLB incidence were similar after the edge regardless of topping. In the edge areas, although tree yield was reduced (∼65 % on average) on TT compared to NTT, topping significantly enhanced external fruit quality. This treatment increased fruit size and weight and promoted intense yellow coloration. Topping increased spray coverage at the top of Hamlin trees by 1.5-fold compared to control. Frequent topping as bait for ACP poses significant risks if the ACP population is not rigorously controlled, potentially leading to further reductions in yield from edge trees.