Exposure of native bees foraging in an agricultural landscape to current-use pesticides
Science of The Total Environment, ISSN: 0048-9697, Vol: 542, Issue: Pt A, Page: 469-477
2016
- 191Citations
- 435Captures
- 2Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations191
- Citation Indexes175
- 175
- CrossRef100
- Policy Citations16
- 16
- Captures435
- Readers435
- 435
- Mentions2
- Blog Mentions1
- 1
- News Mentions1
- 1
Most Recent Blog
Bee Thankful This Thanksgiving: Demand Big Food Stop Killing Our Pollinators
Apples, cranberries, squash, sweet potatoes, beans?these are just a few Thanksgiving table favorites, all of which rely on...
Most Recent News
Center for Biological Diversity Issues Public Comment on EPA Notice
WASHINGTON, March 30 -- Nathan Donley, senior scientist for environmental health program at the Center for Biological Diversity, Tucson, Arizona, has issued a public comment
Article Description
The awareness of insects as pollinators and indicators of environmental quality has grown in recent years, partially in response to declines in honey bee ( Apis mellifera ) populations. While most pesticide research has focused on honey bees, there has been less work on native bee populations. To determine the exposure of native bees to pesticides, bees were collected from an existing research area in northeastern Colorado in both grasslands (2013–2014) and wheat fields (2014). Traps were deployed bi-monthly during the summer at each land cover type and all bees, regardless of species, were composited as whole samples and analyzed for 136 current-use pesticides and degradates. This reconnaissance approach provides a sampling of all species and represents overall pesticide exposure (internal and external). Nineteen pesticides and degradates were detected in 54 composite samples collected. Compounds detected in > 2% of the samples included: insecticides thiamethoxam (46%), bifenthrin (28%), clothianidin (24%), chlorpyrifos (17%), imidacloprid (13%), fipronil desulfinyl (7%; degradate); fungicides azoxystrobin (17%), pyraclostrobin (11%), fluxapyroxad (9%), and propiconazole (9%); herbicides atrazine (19%) and metolachlor (9%). Concentrations ranged from 1 to 310 ng/g for individual pesticides. Pesticides were detected in samples collected from both grasslands and wheat fields; the location of the sample and the surrounding land cover at the 1000 m radius influenced the pesticides detected but because of a small number of temporally comparable samples, correlations between pesticide concentration and land cover were not significant. The results show native bees collected in an agricultural landscape are exposed to multiple pesticides, these results can direct future research on routes/timing of pesticide exposure and the design of future conservation efforts for pollinators.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969715308937; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.10.077; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84946197529&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26520270; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0048969715308937; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.10.077
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know