The science, policy and practice of nature-based solutions: An interdisciplinary perspective
Science of The Total Environment, ISSN: 0048-9697, Vol: 579, Page: 1215-1227
2017
- 932Citations
- 2,114Captures
- 4Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations932
- Citation Indexes846
- 846
- CrossRef760
- Policy Citations86
- Policy Citation86
- Captures2,114
- Readers2,114
- 2,113
- Mentions4
- Blog Mentions2
- Blog2
- News Mentions2
- News2
Most Recent Blog
Greening the Streetscape: Tactical Urbanism in Munich
Due to urban densification processes and increasing confrontation with climate change, cities face the need to organize their public space in efficient and sustainable ways that take current needs as well as those of future generations into account. The Green Infrastructure (GI) concept is a widely used concept, introducing various approaches to implement green elements … Continue reading Greening
Most Recent News
Are ‘Sponge Cities’ the Answer to Shenzhen’s Water Scarcity?
Advertisement Like many other countries, China is facing a multitude of water and water-related challenges, including flooding and droughts, which are linked to climate change.
Article Description
In this paper, we reflect on the implications for science, policy and practice of the recently introduced concept of Nature-Based Solutions (NBS), with a focus on the European context. First, we analyse NBS in relation to similar concepts, and reflect on its relationship to sustainability as an overarching framework. From this, we derive a set of questions to be addressed and propose a general framework for how these might be addressed in NBS projects by funders, researchers, policy-makers and practitioners. We conclude that: (1)NBS need to be developed and discussed in relation to existing concepts to clarify their added value;(2)When considering and implementing NBS, the ‘relabelling’ of related concepts and the misuse of the concept have to be prevented in order to avoid misunderstanding, duplication and unintended consequences;(3)NBS as currently framed by the European Commission provides an opportunity for: a) transdisciplinary research into the design and implementation of solutions based on nature; and b) overcoming a bias towards development alternatives with narrow perspectives that focus on short-term economic gains and effectiveness;(4)The strength of the NBS concept is its integrative, systemic approach which prevents it from becoming just another “green communication tool” that provides justification for a classical model of natural resource exploitation and management measures. To realise their full potential, NBS must be developed by including the experience of all relevant stakeholders such that ‘solutions’ contribute to achieving all dimensions of sustainability. As NBS are developed, we must also moderate the expectations placed on them since the precedent provided by other initiatives whose aim was to manage nature sustainably demonstrates that we should not expect NBS to be cheap and easy, at least not in the short-term.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969716325578; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.106; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85028241470&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27919556; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0048969716325578; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.106; http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0048969716325578; http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969716325578?via%3Dihub
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know