Intensive fertilizer use increases orchard N cycling and lowers net global warming potential
Science of The Total Environment, ISSN: 0048-9697, Vol: 722, Page: 137889
2020
- 34Citations
- 66Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations34
- Citation Indexes34
- 34
- CrossRef13
- Captures66
- Readers66
- 66
Article Description
Nitrogen (N) fertilizer use has simultaneously increased global food production and N losses, resulting in degradation of water quality and climate pollution. A better understanding of N application rates and crop and environmental response is needed to optimize management of agroecosystems. Here we show an orchard agroecosystem with high N use efficiency promoted substantial gains in carbon (C) storage, thereby lowering net global warming potential (GWP). We conducted a 5-year whole-system analysis comparing reduced (224 kg N ha −1 yr −1 ) and intensive (309 kg N ha −1 yr −1 ) fertilizer N rates in a California almond orchard. The intensive rate increased net primary productivity (Mg C ha −1 ) and significantly increased N productivity (kg N ha −1 ) and net N mineralization (mg N kg −1 soil d −1 ). Use of 15 N tracers demonstrated short and long-term mechanisms of soil N retention. These low organic matter soils (0.3–0.5%) rapidly immobilized fertilizer nitrate within 36 h of N application and 15 N in tree biomass recycled back into soil organic matter over five years. Both fertilizer rates resulted in high crop and total N recovery efficiencies of 90% and 98% for the reduced rate, and 72% and 80% for the intensive rate. However, there was no difference in the proportion of N losses to N inputs due to a significant gain in soil total N (TN) in the intensive rate. Higher soil TN significantly increased net N mineralization and a larger gain in soil organic carbon (SOC) from the intensive rate offset nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions, leading to significantly lower net GWP of −1.64 Mg CO 2 -eq ha −1 yr −1 compared to −1.22 Mg CO 2 -eq ha −1 yr −1 for the reduced rate. Our study demonstrates increased N cycling and climate mitigation from intensive fertilizer N use in this orchard agroecosystem, implying a fundamentally different result than seen in conventional annual cropping systems.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969720314029; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137889; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85081693265&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32199384; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0048969720314029; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137889
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know