Evaluating global ecosystem water use efficiency response to drought based on multi-model analysis
Science of The Total Environment, ISSN: 0048-9697, Vol: 778, Page: 146356
2021
- 58Citations
- 67Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Drought has serious consequences on terrestrial ecosystems, particularly for their carbon and water processes. As an important indicator to examine the balance of ecosystem water and carbon cycles, ecosystem water use efficiency (WUE) has been widely used to investigate ecosystem responses to drought. However, the response of WUE to drought and the role of different ecosystem processes in controlling the response of WUE to drought are not well studied. In this paper, we used four WUE datasets from different remote sensing–driven (RS-driven) models and three drought indices (Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index, soil moisture anomaly index and water storage anomaly-based drought index) to comprehensively investigate the response of WUE to drought and its dominant ecosystem processes during the period of 2001–2018. The results showed the WUE datasets from four different RS-driven models had discrepancies in WUE temporal trends, particularly in tropical and subtropical forest and semi-arid regions. The Spearman correlation analysis revealed that the positive correlations between WUE and drought accounted for more than half of global vegetated lands, while negative relationship mainly occurred in the high latitude regions. We further explored the dominant ecosystem processes (represented by GPP and ET) in controlling WUE response to drought, and found ET controlled WUE–drought relationship in the high latitude areas and semi-arid/sub-humid regions, while GPP dominated it in tropical forest regions. Additionally, the effects of GPP and ET on controlling WUE response to drought were examined to change with different drought indices, especially in the semi-arid regions. Our study suggests multi-model analysis tend to reduce uncertainties in analyzing WUE response to drought caused by a single WUE data. Moreover, our results highlight the different role of ecosystem processes in controlling WUE response to drought and provide new information for the underlying mechanism of drought impacts on ecosystem water and carbon cycles.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969721014248; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146356; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85102590576&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34030385; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0048969721014248; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146356
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know