Evaluation of high rate ponds operational and design strategies for algal biomass production and domestic wastewater treatment
Science of The Total Environment, ISSN: 0048-9697, Vol: 791, Page: 148362
2021
- 25Citations
- 68Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations25
- Citation Indexes25
- 25
- CrossRef9
- Captures68
- Readers68
- 68
Article Description
This study evaluated the effect of high rate ponds (HRPs) depth on algal biomass production during domestic wastewater treatment. HRPs were evaluated for 20, 30, and 40 cm depths, with and without CO 2 supplementation. In addition, 40 cm deep HRP with ultraviolet (UV) pre-disinfection was evaluated. The concentration of chlorophyll- a as a function of time for each evaluated condition was represented by logistic models that were after submitted to cluster analysis. The 20 cm HRPs presented higher chlorophyll- a concentration, reaching a maximum of 5.8 and 4.3 mg L −1, in the HRPs with and without CO 2 addition, respectively. Ammonia nitrogen and soluble phosphorus were greater removed in shallower HRPs. The addition of CO 2 influenced the nutrient removal processes, optimizing nutrient recovery by biomass assimilation. HRP configuration did not influence organic matter removal (~40% of removal efficiency in all HRPs), predominant microalgae genera ( Chlorella sp. and Scenedesmus ), and E. coli inactivation (removal of ~2 log units), except for the 20 cm HRP without CO 2 that had removal of 4 log units due to high pH values. For HRPs with CO 2 addition and UV pre-disinfection, the models for 40 cm were grouped together with those obtained for 30 cm HRPs, indicating the same behavior for chlorophyll- a production as a function of time. Thus, it can be concluded that the evaluated strategies represent alternatives for reducing HRP area requirements. Moreover, results may represent advancement and major contributions for HRP design criteria.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969721034331; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148362; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85107914536&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34412414; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0048969721034331; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148362
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know