Temporal impacts of pile burning on vegetation regrowth and soil properties in a Mediterranean environment (Croatia)
Science of The Total Environment, ISSN: 0048-9697, Vol: 799, Page: 149318
2021
- 12Citations
- 18Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Burning slash piles is common in the Mediterranean regions to manage the unwanted biomass. This work aims to study the effect of two experimental pile burns ((moderate (MS) and high severity (HS)) conducted in Croatia on vegetation and soil compared to an unburned treatment (UB). We studied vegetation cover (VC), soil water repellency (SWR), mean weight diameter (MWD), water-stable aggregates (WSA), pH, electrical conductivity (EC), soil organic matter (SOM), the total content of calcium (Ca), aluminium (Al), silicon (Si), and iron (Fe), available phosphorus (P 2 O 5 ) and potassium (K 2 O). The impacts of the burn were studied 5 days after burning (DAB), 3, 8, 12, and 15 months after burn (MAB). The results showed that VC was significantly higher in UB than in MS 5 DAB-15MAB. SWR was significantly higher in the smallest soil fractions (<0.25 mm) in burn treatments than in the UB on 5 DAB and 3 MAB. Also, 3 MAB, MWD and WSA were significantly lower in the burned treatments than in UB. pH was significantly higher in HS than in UB 3, 12 and 15 MAB, while EC was significantly higher in HS than in UB, 5 DAB, 3 and 15 MAB. MS and HS did not significantly affect SOM content. Total Ca was significantly higher in burn treatments than in UB 5 DAB-12 MAB. Total Al and Si were significantly higher in UB than in HS (5 DAB-15MAB), while total Fe was significantly higher in UB than in HS 5 DAB, and 8–15 MAB. P 2 O 5 was significantly higher in HS than in UB from 3 to 15 MAB, while K 2 O was significantly higher in MS and HS than in UB 5 DAB. Soils need more time to recover from pile burning disturbance, likely due to the soil poor natural conditions, therefore this type of management is detrimental.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969721043916; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149318; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85112048084&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34426334; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0048969721043916; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149318
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know