Uptake, transformation, and environmental impact of zinc oxide nanoparticles in a soil-wheat system
Science of The Total Environment, ISSN: 0048-9697, Vol: 857, Issue: Pt 1, Page: 159307
2023
- 22Citations
- 34Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations22
- Citation Indexes22
- 22
- CrossRef6
- Captures34
- Readers34
- 34
Article Description
Zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO-NPs) are metal-based nanomaterials, but their long-term effects on plant growth and the soil environment in the field remain unclear with most previous studies using short-term laboratory and glasshouse studies. In this study, we used a field experiment to examine the long-term effects of ZnO-NPs in a soil-wheat ( Triticum aestivum ) system. It was found that although ZnO-NPs had no significant effect on either yield or the concentration of other nutrients within the grain, the application of ZnO-NPs significantly increased Zn concentrations. Indeed, for grain, the application of ZnO-NPs to both the soil and foliage (SFZnO) (average of 33.1 mg/kg) significantly increased grain Zn concentrations compared to the the control treatment (21.7 mg/kg). Using in situ analyses, nutrients were found to accumulate primarily in the crease tissue and the aleurone layer of the grain, regardless of treatment. Specifically, the concentration of Zn in the aleurone layer for the SFZnO treatment was 2–3 times higher than that in the control, being >300 mg/kg, whilst the Zn concentration in the crease tissue was ca. 600 mg/kg in the SFZnO treatment, being two times higher than for the control. Although the application of ZnO-NPs increased the total Zn within the grain, it did not accumulate within the grain as ZnO-NPs with this being important for food safety, but rather mainly as Zn-phytate, with the remainder of the Zn complexed with either cysteine or phosphate. Finally, we also observed that ZnO-NPs caused fewer changes to the soil bacterial community structure and that it had no nano-specific toxicity.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969722064063; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159307; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85139593883&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36216048; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0048969722064063; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159307
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know