Variation in methane uptake by grassland soils in the context of climate change – A review of effects and mechanisms
Science of The Total Environment, ISSN: 0048-9697, Vol: 871, Page: 162127
2023
- 21Citations
- 35Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations21
- Citation Indexes21
- 21
- CrossRef6
- Captures35
- Readers35
- 35
Review Description
Grassland soils are climate-dependent ecosystems that have a significant greenhouse gas mitigating function through their ability to store large amounts of carbon (C). However, what is often not recognized is that they can also exhibit a high methane (CH 4 ) uptake capacity that could be influenced by future increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) concentration and variations in temperature and water availability. While there is a wealth of information on C sequestration in grasslands there is less consensus on how climate change impacts on CH 4 uptake or the underlying mechanisms involved. To address this, we assessed existing knowledge on the impact of climate change components on CH 4 uptake by grassland soils. Increases in precipitation associated with soils with a high background soil moisture content generally resulted in a reduction in CH 4 uptake or even net emissions, while the effect was opposite in soils with a relatively low background moisture content. Initially wet grasslands subject to the combined effects of warming and water deficits may absorb more CH 4, mainly due to increased gas diffusivity. However, in the longer-term heat and drought stress may reduce the activity of methanotrophs when the mean soil moisture content is below the optimum for their survival. Enhanced plant productivity and growth under elevated CO 2, increased soil moisture and changed nutrient concentrations, can differentially affect methanotrophic activity, which is often reduced by increasing N deposition. Our estimations showed that CH 4 uptake in grassland soils can change from −57.7 % to +6.1 % by increased precipitation, from −37.3 % to +85.3 % by elevated temperatures, from +0.87 % to +92.4 % by decreased precipitation, and from −66.7 % to +27.3 % by elevated CO 2. In conclusion, the analysis suggests that grasslands under the influence of warming and drought may absorb even more CH 4, mainly because of reduced soil water contents and increased gas diffusivity.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004896972300743X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162127; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85147735451&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36764535; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S004896972300743X; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162127
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know