Whole-sediment toxicity bioassays with Hyalella curvispina as a valuable bioanalytical tool for assessing pesticide risks in watercourses with different types of agro-productive activities
Science of The Total Environment, ISSN: 0048-9697, Vol: 908, Page: 168286
2024
- 9Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures9
- Readers9
Article Description
The current Argentine agricultural production model is dependent on agrochemicals such as fertilizers and pesticides. Extensive agriculture and horticulture are the two major productive activities that use copious amounts of pesticides. Extensive agriculture is characterized by areas of 50 to 100 ha of a single crop, while peri-urban horticulture is characterized by intense land use, with farms ranging from 1 to 3 ha cultivated with a variety of vegetables. Despite the relevance of pesticides, data on their effects on the biota associated with nearby watercourses are scarce. Given this paucity of knowledge, the objective of the present work was to assess the relative impact of extensive agriculture and horticulture on sediment quality in representative watercourses by conducting whole-sediment toxicity bioassays with the native amphipod Hyalella curvispina. The lower Gualeguay Basin, in the Province of Entre Ríos, was selected as a representative watercourse impacted by extensive agriculture, and the Carnaval Creek, on the periphery of La Plata, Province of Buenos Aires, was selected as a horticulture-impacted watercourse. Growth inhibition (sublethal effect) was observed in both systems, whereas mortality (lethal effect) was largely observed in horticulture. The observed effects were integrated with pesticide concentrations in the same sediments and correlated by multivariate analysis, revealing that toxicity was mainly due to insecticides, particularly λ-cyhalothrin. Therefore, horticultural practices and their associated pesticide use could potentially endanger the benthic fauna of nearby watercourses.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969723069139; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168286; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85176234097&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37924881; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0048969723069139; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168286
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know