Spatial source apportionment of airborne coarse particulate matter using PMF-Bayesian receptor model
Science of The Total Environment, ISSN: 0048-9697, Vol: 917, Page: 170235
2024
- 6Citations
- 16Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Ambient particulate matter (PM 2.5 and PM 10 ), has been extensively monitored in numerous urban areas across the globe. Over the past decade, there has been a significant improvement in PM 2.5 air quality, while improvements in PM 10 levels have been comparatively modest, primarily due to the limited reduction in coarse particle (PM 2.5 – 10 ) pollution. Unlike PM 2.5, PM 2.5 – 10 predominantly originates from local emissions and is often characterized by pronounced spatial heterogeneity. In this study, we utilized over one million data points on PM concentrations, collected from >100 monitoring sites within a Chinese megacity, to perform spatial source apportionment of PM 2.5 – 10. Despite the widespread availability of such data, it has rarely been employed for this purpose. We employed an enhanced positive matrix factorization approach, capable of handling large datasets, in conjunction with a Bayesian multivariate receptor model to deduce spatial source impacts. Four primary sources were successfully identified and interpreted, including residential burning, industrial processes, road dust, and meteorology-related sources. This interpretation was supported by a considerable body of prior knowledge concerning emission sources, which is usually unavailable in most cases. The methodology proposed in this study demonstrates significant potential for generalization to other regions, thereby contributing to the development of air quality management strategies.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004896972400370X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170235; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85183871041&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38244635; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S004896972400370X; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170235
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know