Analysis of effects and factors linked to soil microbial populations and nitrogen cycling under long-term biosolids application
Science of The Total Environment, ISSN: 0048-9697, Vol: 934, Page: 173216
2024
- 2Citations
- 10Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Information about impacts of long-term biosolids application on soil microbial populations and functional groups and N cycling is important for evaluating soil health and agroecosystem sustainability under long-term biosolids application. Mine spoil plots received annual biosolids application from 1973 to 2010 at low (16.8 Mg ha −1 yr −1 ), medium (33.6 Mg ha −1 yr −1 ), and high rates (67.2 Mg ha −1 yr −1 ). A no-biosolids control received chemical fertilizer at the agronomic rate. Soil samples were collected in three seasons per year spanning 2003–2005 for measuring soil moisture, pH, soil organic C (SOC), total and extractable heavy metals (Cd, Cu, Ni, Zn), NO 3 −, N mineralization potential (NMP), microbial biomass C (MBC), and populations of three N-cycling bacteria (NCB) groups: ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB), nitrite-oxidizing bacteria (NOB), and denitrifying bacteria (DNB). Soil samples were collected again in 2008 and 2010 for quantifying total and extractable heavy metals, and in 2018 (eight years after biosolids applications ended) for measuring SOC, MBC, NMP, and microbial respiration. During 2003–2005, mean MBC was 315, 554, 794, and 1001 mg kg −1 in the control, low, medium, and high biosolids treatments, respectively. Populations of NCB did not differ among treatments. Biosolids application increased total and extractable metal concentrations but the effect of biosolids rates were much lower on extractable than total concentrations. Soil extractable Cd and Cu concentrations decreased from medium to high applications, likely due to complexing with biosolids organic matter. Partial least squares regression analysis identified a strong positive effect on MBC of SOC and a weak negative effect of Cu, explaining the strong net positive effect of biosolids on MBC. In 2018, the medium and high biosolids treatments maintained higher SOC, MBC, NMP, and microbial respiration than the control. This study provided further evidence that long-term biosolids application has positive effects on soil microbes that persist for years after ending application.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969724033631; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173216; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85193501998&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38776785; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0048969724033631; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173216
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know