Molecular insight into the allocation of organic carbon to heterotrophic bacteria: Carbon metabolism and the involvement in nitrogen and phosphorus removal
Science of The Total Environment, ISSN: 0048-9697, Vol: 933, Page: 173302
2024
- 5Citations
- 6Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Carbon metabolism and nutrient removal are crucial for biological wastewater treatment. This study focuses on analyzing carbon allocation and utilization by heterotrophic bacteria in response to increasing COD concentration in the influent. The study also assesses the effect of denitrification and biological phosphorus removal, particularly in combination with anaerobic ammonia oxidation (anammox). The experiment was conducted in a SBR operating under anaerobic/anoxic/oxic conditions. As COD concentration in the influent increased from 100 to 275 mg/L, intracellular COD accounted for 95.72 % of the COD removed. By regulating the NO 3 − concentration in the anoxic stage from 10 to 30 mg/L, the nitrite accumulation rate reached 69.46 %, which could serve as an electron acceptor for anammox. Most genes related to the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle declined, while the genes involved in the glyoxylate cycle, gluconeogenesis, PHA synthesis increased. This suggests that glycogen accumulation and carbon storage, rather than direct carbon oxidation, was the dominant pathway for carbon metabolism. However, the genes responsible for the reduction of NO 2 − -N ( nir K) and NO ( nos B) decreased, contributing to NO 2 − accumulation. The study also employed metagenomic analysis to reveal microbial interactions. The enrichment of specific bacterial species, including Dechloromonas sp. (D2.bin.10), Ca. Competibacteraceae bacterium (D9.bin.8), Ca. Desulfobacillus denitrificans (D6.bin.17), and Ignavibacteriae bacterium (D3.bin.9), played a collaborative role in facilitating nutrient removal and promoting the combination with anammox.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969724034491; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173302; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85192881970&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38759923; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0048969724034491; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173302
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know