Biofouling sponges as natural eDNA samplers for marine vertebrate biodiversity monitoring
Science of The Total Environment, ISSN: 0048-9697, Vol: 946, Page: 174148
2024
- 2Citations
- 29Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent News
Blistering Barnacles! Boat detritus boost for marine conservation
Nobody likes biofouling. Even the word sounds unpleasant. But the periodic cleaning of barnacles, algae and other growths from boat hulls, piers and offshore platforms
Article Description
Environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis has now become a core approach in marine biodiversity research, which typically involves the collection of water or sediment samples. Yet, recently, filter-feeding organisms have received much attention for their potential role as natural eDNA samplers. While the indiscriminate use of living organisms as ‘sampling tools’ might in some cases raise conservation concerns, there are instances in which highly abundant sessile organisms may become a nuisance as biofouling on artificial marine structures. Here we demonstrate how a sea sponge species that colonizes the moorings of the world's largest curtain of hydroacoustic receivers can become a powerful natural collector of fish biodiversity information. By sequencing eDNA extracted from Vazella pourtalesii retrieved from moorings during routine biofouling maintenance, we detected 23 species of marine fish and mammals, compared to 19 and 15 species revealed by surface and bottom water eDNA respectively, and 28 species captured by groundfish survey in the surrounding area, which are more ecologically impactful and involve higher additional costs. Sponge-based species inventories proved at least as informative as those obtained by traditional survey methods, and are also able to detect seasonal differences in fish assemblages. We conclude that opportunistic sampling of marine sponge biofouling may become an efficient way to document and monitor biodiversity in our rapidly changing oceans.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969724042967; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174148; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85197371579&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38906285; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0048969724042967; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174148
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know