Triaxial-mechanical and permeability properties of coal body under varying CO 2 pressures
Science of The Total Environment, ISSN: 0048-9697, Vol: 946, Page: 174261
2024
- 2Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The sequestration of CO 2 in coal seams has become an effective way to curb greenhouse-gas emissions. Coal mechanics and permeability properties are key factors affecting the safe sequestration of CO 2 in coal seams, and both are significantly affected by the CO 2 injection pressure. In this study, triaxial compression-permeability tests were conducted on coal under varying CO 2 and limited confining pressures using a measurement system to determine the coupled mechanical properties and adsorption permeability of coal. The effects of CO 2 pressure on the mechanical properties and evolution of coal permeability were investigated. A three-dimensional statistical damage constitutive model of coal that considers CO 2 adsorption damage was established. The results showed that the stress–strain curve of the coal was divided into four stages. During the first two stages, the amplitudes of the permeability changes were small, whereas at the peak stress point, a permeability “jump” phenomenon occurred, after which an increase in stress resulted in a slower amplitude increase in permeability. The CO 2 pressure had an evident damage-deterioration effect on the mechanical properties of the coal samples, and the primary failure characteristic was shearing damage. The higher the CO 2 pressure, the higher the degree of internal fragmentation and fracture network complexity of the coal body. During the triaxial compression-permeability experiment, the normalized permeability of the coal samples tended to increase slowly, followed by a rapid increase and back to a slow increase. However, with increasing CO 2 pressure, the initial permeability of the coal samples decreased, whereas the normalized permeability increased sharply. The rationality and accuracy of the constitutive model were verified by comparing the established constitutive model and test stress–strain curves of the coal samples. The results of this study can provide theoretical references for CO 2 geological storage and facilitate the selection of appropriate CO 2 injection pressures.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969724044097; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174261; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85197252151&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38925386; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0048969724044097; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174261
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know