Assessing controls on sedimentation rates and sediment organic carbon accretion in beaver ponds
Science of The Total Environment, ISSN: 0048-9697, Vol: 949, Page: 174951
2024
- 1Citations
- 8Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Beaver dams trap sediment, promote channel-floodplain connectivity, modify biogeochemical cycling and organic carbon (OC) storage, and influence geomorphic form. Beaver-related sediment accumulation has been investigated at longer timescales (e.g., > 1000 years) and shorter timescales (< 10 years), but we lack information on sedimentation and sediment-associated OC accretion rates over multiple decades in relatively persistent beaver ponds (10–100 years old). We coupled field surveys of 45 beaver ponds with historical aerial imagery and radiometric dating with 7 Be, 210 Pb, and 14 C to calculate sedimentation rates, mean sediment depth, and sediment OC content at two study sites in the southern Rocky Mountains, USA. Sedimentation rates in beaver ponds (median = 5.7 cm yr −1, mean = 11.6 cm yr −1 ) decreased with pond age. Incised, single threaded reaches had greater variability in mean sediment depth compared to less incised reaches. In less incised reaches, mean sediment depth and beaver dam height increased with pond age, indicating more stable dams and depositional environments. Sediment OC content within beaver ponds (median = 0.8 %, mean = 1.7 %) increased with finer sediment grain size distributions. Sediment OC accretion rates in ponds ranged between 0.13 and 23 Mg C ha −1 per year. We used Monte Carlo simulations to estimate it would take ∼100 years or more of uninhibited beaver activity for deposition to laterally reconnect adjacent terraces in the incised study reaches, a common objective within many stream restoration projects. Our findings show that beaver ponds in complex, multi-threaded reaches better retain fine sediment over longer timescales, highlighting the need to incorporate geomorphic context when considering whether beaver can help restore incised river channels and floodplain connectivity, retain fine sediment, and store OC on the landscape.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969724051015; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174951; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85199959924&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39067609; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0048969724051015
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know