PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Identifying bound compounds in non-extractable residues of pesticides in soil by 4-pool kinetic analysis

Science of The Total Environment, ISSN: 0048-9697, Vol: 955, Page: 176814
2024
  • 0
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 1
    Captures
  • 0
    Mentions
  • 0
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

Article Description

This study explores the feasibility of identifying bound compounds in non-extractable residues (NERs) of pesticides in soil by 4-pool kinetic analysis. The 4-pools refer to parent compound, metabolites, NERs, and CO 2 in 14 C-labeled pesticide soil degradation studies. We discovered the following two characteristic 4-pool kinetic behaviors of formation of NERs: (1) if parent compound is bound as NERs, the metabolites ( m (t) in % applied radioactivity (AR)) kinetically drive the evolution of CO 2 only; and (2) if a metabolite ( x ) in a sequential degradation pathway is bound as NERs, m (t) is split into m 1 (t) and m 2 (t) at the metabolite ( x ) that is bound as NERs, which kinetically drive the formation of NERs and evolution of CO 2 respectively. We developed two (i.e., Parent➔NER and metabolite➔NER) 4-pool models to capture the kinetic behaviors respectively. By fitting the models to a set of 4-pool data, we not only determine whether NERs form from parent compound or metabolites but also identify the bound metabolite ( x ) by resolving the metabolites into M 1 (t) and M 2 (t) (i.e., the variables used to simulate m 1 (t) and m 2 (t)) and then matching m 1 (t) (i.e., the sum of the bound metabolite ( x ) and its metabolite precursors) with M 1 (t). By applying the models to 14 C-labeled parent compound-dosed studies and then sequentially to metabolite-dosed studies for 7 pesticides with ≥70 % AR NERs, we identified the bound compounds, which have the moieties known to be responsible for NERs, are bound as NERs instantaneously when dosed into soil, and account for pH dependency of NER formation.

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know