Optimising microplastic polyethylene terephthalate fibre extraction from sediments: Tailoring a density-separation procedure for enhanced recovery and reliability
Science of The Total Environment, ISSN: 0048-9697, Vol: 957, Page: 177483
2024
- 7Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures7
- Readers7
Article Description
Despite the presence of microplastics in sediments being widely acknowledged, the absence of standardised processing methods in extracting microplastics can compromise reliable and comparable results. Density separation is a predominant method for extracting microplastics from sediments. In this study, Sodium Polytungstate (ρ = 1.6 g cm −3 ) was selected as the density separation agent for three key factors: i) optimal density for extracting common plastic polymers, ii) low toxicity, and iii) recycling potential of the solution. It is therefore cost-effective, and the risk of solution dispersal is minimal. The solution was tested through four separation procedures, extracting PET fibres from three artificial sediment mixtures (i.e., pure sand, pure mud, and 50 % sand and 50 % mud). The results indicate that the solution employed in this work is highly effective for extracting microplastic fibres from sediments, with recovery rates up to 99 %. However, the results highlight differences in the recovery among the four procedures and in terms of the sediment characteristics. Specifically, extracting microplastics was easier in sandy sediment samples than in mud-rich ones. The complexity of extracting microplastics from mud-rich sediments results from i) the creation of microplastic-sediment aggregates forming denser structures, that settle down trapping microplastics in sediments; ii) the development of a clay sediment cap that hinders the rise of microplastics to the surface. Reducing the risk of underestimation of microplastic content in mud-rich samples can be accomplished by applying a procedure that involves placing the samples with the Sodium Polytungstate solution on a stirring plate while progressively lowering the rotation velocity. Using this method, cohesive sediments lose their ability to trap microplastics while aggregating, consequently reducing their ability to drag microplastics to the bottom. This facilitated microplastics to reach the liquid surface, thereby enabling an efficient retrieval even in mud-rich samples.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004896972407640X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177483; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85209144872&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39528223; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S004896972407640X
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know