Carbon footprint and embodied carbon transfer at city level: A nested MRIO analysis of Central Plain urban agglomeration in China
Sustainable Cities and Society, ISSN: 2210-6707, Vol: 83, Page: 103977
2022
- 44Citations
- 44Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
With the establishment of several carbon peak and carbon neutrality strategies in China, urban carbon mitigation has become a critical issue. Understanding how cities obtain, distribute, and manage their carbon emissions could be an essential step for collaborative management of regional carbon emission reduction. In the present study, by compiling a nested multi-regional input-output table, an investigation was conducted into the city-level carbon footprints and inter-regional CO 2 transfer embodied in the trade of finished goods at home and abroad for 29 cities in Central Plain urban agglomeration. The total carbon footprint of the urban agglomeration was found to be 1144.6 Mt, accounting for 10% of the national emissions, and significant differences were observed in the city-level carbon footprints, ranging from 3.2 Mt (Huaibei) to 176.3 Mt (Zhengzhou). The carbon footprint per capita also varied greatly, from Huaibei (1.4 t) to Jiyuan (20.7 t), and was significantly correlated with GDP per capita. CO 2 emissions due to capital formation contributed the most to the carbon footprint, followed by urban consumption. Through the export of numerous industrial products to support infrastructure construction and economic activities, the urban agglomeration received 736.3 Mt net emissions from other regions at home and abroad. Significant embodied CO 2 transfer was observed to drift from energy-abundant cities, such as Pingdingshan and Shangqiu, to richer cities, such as Zhengzhou and Luoyang. The inter-city CO 2 flows were mainly shaped by heavy industry, construction and service sectors. Finally, targeted mitigation policy methods have been recommended for different types of cities from production and consumption perspectives.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210670722002979; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103977; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85132395429&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2210670722002979; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103977
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know