Germ layers to organs: Using Xenopus to study “later” development
Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology, ISSN: 1084-9521, Vol: 17, Issue: 1, Page: 133-145
2006
- 36Citations
- 70Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations36
- Citation Indexes36
- 36
- CrossRef28
- Captures70
- Readers70
- 70
Review Description
The amphibian embryo is a highly successful model system with great promise for organogenesis research. Since the late 1800s, amphibians have been employed to understand vertebrate development and since the 1950s, the African clawed frog Xenopus laevis has been the amphibian of choice. In the past two decades, Xenopus has led the way forward in, among other things, identifying transcription factors, gene regulatory networks and inter- and intracellular signaling pathways that control early development (from fertilization through gastrulation and neurulation). Perhaps the best measure of how successful Xenopus has been as a model for early mammalian development is the observation that much of the knowledge gleaned from Xenopus studies has subsequently directly translated to discoveries of similar mechanisms operating in mouse development. Despite this great success in early development, research on organogenesis in Xenopus has lagged behind the mouse. However, recent technical advances now make Xenopus amenable for studies on later development, including organogenesis. Here, we discuss why Xenopus is well suited for such research and, we believe, permits addressing questions that have been difficult to approach using other model systems. We also highlight how Xenopus researchers have already begun studying a number of major organs, pancreas, liver, kidney and heart, and suggest how Xenopus might contribute more to these areas in the near future.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1084952105001138; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2005.11.002; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33644746214&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16337415; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1084952105001138; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2005.11.002
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know