Evolution of distributional alignment goals
Seminars in Spine Surgery, ISSN: 1040-7383, Vol: 35, Issue: 4, Page: 101063
2023
- 4Citations
- 4Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Concepts regarding sagittal plane alignment in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery are evolving in the pursuit of individualized care with personalized targets. We have moved past simple targets of mismatch between lumbar lordosis and pelvic incidence, as these ignore the distribution, and the subsequent shape, of lumbar lordosis. Several classification systems and alignment strategies exist, with some proposing alignment to “normal” while others seek age-appropriate spinal alignment. While differences exist, the importance of the pelvic incidence as a fixed parameter from which one may build the spine is common to all theories. The purpose of this narrative review is to summarize the literature regarding the current concepts behind spinal alignment theories and the data supporting these theories.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040738323000576; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semss.2023.101063; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85175650343&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1040738323000576; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semss.2023.101063
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know