Filtration performance of three dimensional fabric filter in a membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment
Separation and Purification Technology, ISSN: 1383-5866, Vol: 157, Page: 17-26
2016
- 12Citations
- 33Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This study investigates the filtration performance of three dimensional (3D) woven fabric filters with various structures in a membrane bioreactor (MBR). Five 3D woven fabrics with the same component materials but different tightness, and a 2D fabric as the control are adopted as filters in a laboratory-scale submerged MBR. In a 6 h operation, the changes of the fluxes and the turbidities of all filters have the same trend and the 3D filter with the highest porosity has the highest flux and similar turbidity as that of the 2D filter while 3D filter with the lowest porosity has the lowest flux. In a one-month operation, the high porosity 3D filter has total amount of treated water about 1.7 times and 2.5 times as much as those through the low porosity 3D fabric and the 2D filter, respectively. Toward the end of the one-month operation, the ranges of the turbidity for the high porosity 3D filter were 1–1.5 NTU and 1.3–2.5 NTU, 1.6–2.2 NTU for low porosity 3D filter and 2D filter, respectively. The fouling analysis shows that high porosity 3D filter has a thick and the low porosity 3D filter has a thin cake layer mainly circumferentially distributed along sealing rubber ring, while the 2D nylon filter surface only covered by a thin and incomplete cake layer. The 3D filter with lower tightness shows in-depth penetration of foulants while the 2D and 3D tightly woven filters have foulants concentrated in the first layer of the fabrics.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1383586615303452; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2015.11.022; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84948417531&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1383586615303452; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2015.11.022
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know