A review on enhancing sulfur-resistant capacity and magnetism of adsorbent for mercury removal from coal fired flue gas
Separation and Purification Technology, ISSN: 1383-5866, Vol: 348, Page: 127709
2024
- 1Citations
- 5Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent News
Findings in Chemicals and Chemistry Reported from Zhejiang University (A Review On Enhancing Sulfur-resistant Capacity and Magnetism of Adsorbent for Mercury Removal From Coal Fired Flue Gas)
2024 NOV 22 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Health & Medicine Daily -- Investigators publish new report on Chemicals and Chemistry.
Review Description
The injection of Hg adsorbent is commonly received as the most effective method for Hg removal in coal-fired flue gas. Both of SO 2 -poisoning resistance and magnetism are of great significance for Hg adsorbent to achieve the catalytic oxidation of Hg 0 and the separation with fly ash. In this study, the effects of environmental temperature and flue gas composition including O 2, NO, HCl, and H 2 O(g) on SO 2 resistance of Hg adsorbent were previously summarized. Then, the principle of four main methods for enhancing the SO 2 -poisoning resistance including active site protection method, active site increase method, oxygen active site avoidance method, and noble metal catalysis method were respectively introduced. Subsequently, the research status of magnetic adsorbent including magnetic carbon-based, magnetic zeolite-based, magnetic biochar, magnetic spinel-based, magnetosphere, and magnetic core–shell adsorbent were separately summarized. Subsequently, the environmental impact, economic feasibility, and industrial application prospects of current methods for enhancing SO 2 resistance and magnetism of Hg adsorbent were discussed. Based on these above, targeted suggestions and prospects including developing CuO-based catalytic adsorbent with good synergistic performance on SO 2 poisoning resistance and NO/Hg removal, maximizing the catalytic performance of SCR catalyst on Hg removal, developing low temperature SCR catalysts, developing magnetic core–shell structure with cooperative performance on SO 2 poisoning resistance and magnetic separation were respectively proposed.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1383586624014485; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2024.127709; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85191655952&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1383586624014485; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2024.127709
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know