Development of nucleocapsid-specific monoclonal antibodies for SARS-CoV-2 and their ELISA diagnostics on an automatic microfluidic device
Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, ISSN: 0925-4005, Vol: 380, Page: 133331
2023
- 14Citations
- 24Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations14
- Citation Indexes14
- 14
- CrossRef4
- Captures24
- Readers24
- 24
Article Description
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has threatened public health globally, and the emergence of viral variants has exacerbated an already precarious situation. To prevent further spread of the virus and determine government action required for virus control, accurate and rapid immunoassays for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis are urgently needed. In this study, we generated monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein (NP), compared their reactivity using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and selected four mAbs designated 1G6, 3E10, 3F10, and 5B6 which have higher reactivity to NP and viral lysates of SARS-CoV-2 than other mAbs. Using an epitope mapping assay, we identified that 1G6 detected the C-terminal domain of SARS-CoV-2 NP (residues 248–364), while 3E10 and 3F10 bound to the N-terminal domain (residues 47–174) and 3F10 detected the N-arm region (residues 1–46) of SARS-CoV-2 NP. Based on the epitope study and sandwich ELISA, we selected the 1G6 and 3E10 Abs as an optimal Ab pair and applied them for a microfluidics-based point-of-care (POC) ELISA assay to detect the NPs of SARS-CoV-2 and its variants. The integrated and automatic microfluidic system could operate the serial injection of the sample, the washing solution, the HRP-conjugate antibody, and the TMB substrate solution simply by controlling air purge via a single syringe. The proposed Ab pair-equipped microsystem effectively detected the NPs of SARS-CoV-2 variants as well as in clinical samples. Collectively, our proposed platform provides an advanced protein-based diagnostic tool for detecting SARS-CoV-2.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925400523000461; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2023.133331; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85146472469&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36644652; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0925400523000461; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2023.133331
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know