Improvement in health-related quality of life in first year after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding
Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, ISSN: 1550-7289, Vol: 8, Issue: 3, Page: 260-268
2012
- 30Citations
- 58Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations30
- Citation Indexes30
- 30
- CrossRef27
- Captures58
- Readers58
- 58
Article Description
We analyzed the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and its determinants in the first year after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB). The setting was 10 Italian public and private bariatric surgery centers. Data collected in an ongoing, prospective, 3-year multicenter Italian study on the changes in HRQOL after LAGB were used. HRQOL was investigated using the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 questionnaire. Hunger, satiety, and the self-perceived effects of LAGB were recorded. A total of 334 patients were enrolled. The follow-up rate was 92.2%. The percentage of excess weight loss was 39.6% ± 25.8%, with very few side effects or complications. Hunger in the morning (0–10 scale) was 4.5 ± 2.7 before surgery and 3.8 ± 2.4 after 1 year ( P <.001). Satiety after a meal (0–10 scale) was 7.1 ± 2.7 before surgery and 8.2 ± 1.9 at 1 year ( P <.001). The self-perceived effect of LAGB on caloric intake (0–10 scale) was 8.4 ± 1.9 after 1 year. The scores for the 8 Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 subscales were significantly improved after surgery. The physical component summary score was 52.6 ± 11.9 at baseline and 79.1 ± 15.6 after 1 year ( P <.001). The corresponding mental component summary scores were 52.2 ± 12.3 and 76.5 ± 17.2 ( P <.001). Greater physical component summary improvement was independently associated with a low initial physical component summary ( P <.001), high satiety ( P =.002), a high percentage of excess weight loss ( P =.013), and a high self-perceived effect of the LAGB ( P =.026). Greater mental component summary improvement was associated with a low initial mental component summary ( P <.001), high satiety ( P <.001), a low frequency of heartburn ( P =.004), and a high percentage of excess weight loss ( P =.012). Significant improvements in HRQOL were observed in the first year after LAGB. A poor baseline HRQOL, a high efficacy of the banding in eating control, and better weight loss might influence HRQOL changes.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550728912000214; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2011.12.012; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84861198509&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22398112; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1550728912000214; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2011.12.012
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know