Technological Advances in the Surgical Treatment of Colorectal Cancer
Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America, ISSN: 1055-3207, Vol: 31, Issue: 2, Page: 183-218
2022
- 7Citations
- 18Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations7
- Citation Indexes7
- CrossRef2
- Captures18
- Readers18
- 18
Review Description
Efforts toward standardization of surgical techniques have facilitated adoption of oncologic resections for colorectal cancer with associated improvement in outcomes. With the introduction of laparoscopy, total mesorectal excision (TME) and complete mesocolic excision (CME) techniques were progressively adapted to the minimally invasive surgery (MIS) approach with significant benefits with regards to patient recovery and comparable oncologic outcomes when performed by surgeons beyond their learning curve. Anastomotic complications and functional disturbances following TME remain significant. Recent innovations include intracorporeal anastomosis, which avoids midline extraction sites, and transanal TME, which lowers conversion rates and facilitates sphincter preservation for low rectal tumors.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1055320722000011; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soc.2022.01.001; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85127069699&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35351273; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1055320722000011; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soc.2022.01.001
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know