Nudging when the descriptive norm is low: Evidence from a carbon offsetting field experiment
Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, ISSN: 2214-8043, Vol: 110, Page: 102194
2024
- 32Usage
- 29Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage32
- Abstract Views31
- Downloads1
- Captures29
- Readers29
- 29
Article Description
Social interventions are a popular tool to stimulate pro-social (including climate-friendly) behavior. Their use is, however, limited when the descriptive norm is low, i.e. when a desirable behavior is only practiced by a minority within the respective reference group. We tackle this issue by testing new strategies for social interventions, with an especially sophisticated target group. We implement a field experiment at two subsequent conferences in environmental economics, with which we examine the conference participants’ proclivity to offset carbon emissions. For the two treatment conditions that we introduce, we document an average null effect. Yet, for one condition, we find that the intervention can be effective when the targeted individuals feel socially close to the referenced peer group. Further, we find suggestive evidence that the effectiveness of such interventions increases as individuals are exposed to repeated treatment, but with decreasing marginal returns.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221480432400034X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2024.102194; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85189695902&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S221480432400034X; https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/econ_facpub/337; https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1338&context=econ_facpub; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2024.102194
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know