Effect of flexibility ratio on seismic response of rectangular tunnels in sand: Experimental and numerical investigation
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, ISSN: 0267-7261, Vol: 157, Page: 107256
2022
- 32Citations
- 16Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The flexibility ratio( F ) is defined as the stiffness of a structure relative to that of soil, a critical factor affecting the soil–structure interaction. This study aimed to investigate the effect of F on the seismic response of rectangular tunnels constructed in sand. Shaking table tests were performed based on a scale model of a tunnel with different stiffness values. A 3D finite element model was established using ABAQUS, and the numerical results were compared with the test results. Subsequently, the verified model was implemented in a parametric study. The results showed that tunnels with lower F have higher acceleration responses in the high frequency-range of input motions. In addition, the amplification of the ground acceleration decreases with an increase in F, and the maximum response occurs in a longer period relative to the free-field. The distribution of the dynamic earth pressure along the tunnel lining with different F is relatively complex; nevertheless, overall, rigid tunnels have greater values than flexible tunnels. The dynamic bending moment along the tunnel sidewall decreases with increasing F, but it has the same trend along the sidewall. The presented results may lead to a better understanding of the seismic response of rectangular tunnels constructed in sand, providing practical references for the seismic design of similar underground structures.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267726122001051; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107256; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85126533853&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0267726122001051; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107256
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know