Evaluating the recycling potential and economic benefits of end-of-life power batteries in China based on different scenarios
Sustainable Production and Consumption, ISSN: 2352-5509, Vol: 47, Page: 145-155
2024
- 7Citations
- 44Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent News
Findings on Sustainable Production and Consumption Reported by Investigators at Chengdu University of Technology (Evaluating the Recycling Potential and Economic Benefits of End-of-life Power Batteries In China Based On Different Scenarios)
2024 JUL 04 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Daily China News -- Current study results on Sustainability Research - Sustainable Production
Article Description
Recycling of end-of-life (EOL) power batteries has emerged as a vital strategy to mitigate resource depletion and minimize environmental pollution. This study utilizes the Stanford model and scenario analysis to project the EOL and reuse quantities of electric vehicle (EV) batteries in China from 2023 to 2035. Additionally, this study examines the potential for recycling and the economic advantages associated with echelon utilization and recovery utilization of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). Results show that: (1) In 2035, China's EOL LIBs volume will potentially reach 11.77 million tons. And the battery reused volume will be up to 4.17 million tons, which can meet 55 % of the demand. (2) In 2035, up to 1468 Gwh of batteries could be allocated for echelon utilization, yielding economic benefits of $40.5 billion in load shifting and peak shaving, $25.1 billion in China Tower savings, and 4.57 million new batteries saved in low-speed vehicles. (3) Among the critical materials recycled in batteries, cobalt(Co) holds the highest economic value at $8.2 billion, followed by lithium(Li) at $4.3 billion. (4) The amount of nickel (Ni), Co, manganese(Mn), and graphite recovered in 2035 could satisfy battery manufacturing requirements. This study offers guidance to government and enterprises in formulating a circular economy strategy for battery recycling and processing.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352550924000988; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2024.04.001; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85189692085&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2352550924000988; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2024.04.001
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know