Cultural aspects as a root cause of organizational failure in risk and crisis management in the Fukushima Daiichi disaster
Safety Science, ISSN: 0925-7535, Vol: 135, Page: 105091
2021
- 18Citations
- 77Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This study explores root causes of the Fukushima Daiichi disaster and discusses how an urgent situation, such as a station blackout (SBO), should be addressed on an organizational and managerial level so that future disasters may be prevented. First, based on the summary of the literature on this disaster, the malfunctions and troubles of facilities that caused the disaster are extracted. Second, it is verified that these malfunctions were caused by failures of organizational risk and crisis management. Third, we discuss the reason why an organizational failure in risk and crisis management occurred from the viewpoints of cultural aspects such as groupism (“Wa”), obedience to authority, willful blindness, open safety culture, and just culture.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753520304884; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105091; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85097139685&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0925753520304884; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105091
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know