A smart-phone intervention to address mental health stigma in the construction industry: A two-arm randomised controlled trial
SSM - Population Health, ISSN: 2352-8273, Vol: 4, Page: 164-168
2018
- 30Citations
- 153Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations30
- Citation Indexes28
- 28
- CrossRef11
- Policy Citations2
- 2
- Captures153
- Readers153
- 153
Article Description
High levels of self-stigma are associated with a range of adverse mental health, treatment, and functional outcomes. This prospective study examined the effects of an electronic mental health stigma reduction intervention on self-stigma (self-blame, shame, and help-seeking inhibition) among male construction workers in Australia. Male construction workers (N = 682) were randomly assigned to receive either the intervention condition or the wait list control over a six-week period. Self-stigma was assessed using the Self-Stigma of Depression Scale at post-intervention. We conducted linear regression to assess the effectiveness of the intervention on self-stigma, adjusting for relevant covariates. Self-stigma was relatively low in the sample. The intervention had no significant effect on self-stigma, after adjusting for confounders. There were reductions in stigma in both the intervention and control groups at 6-week follow-up. Process evaluation indicated that participants generally enjoyed the program and felt that it was beneficial to their mental health. These observations underscore the need for further research to elucidate understanding of the experience of self-stigma among employed males.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235282731730215X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2017.12.007; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85044465240&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29349285; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S235282731730215X; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2017.12.007
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know